Charming 1-bedroom apartment Southfields, London

Location: 89 Pirbright Road A, London, gb

Star Rating: 6.2 Stars

Property Type: Apartments

About this Property

Important Information

Policies

Check-in: 02:00 PM - 11:00 PM

Check-out: 11:00 AM

Amenities & Facilities

• Offsite parking discounted rates available
• Parking
• Non-smoking throughout
• Free wired internet
• Self parking (surcharge)
• Offsite parking discounted rates available
• Internet access

Rooms Available

• One-Bedroom Apartment

  The apartment's kitchen is available for cooking and storing food. This apartment has a washing machine, heating, a flat-screen TV and garden views. The unit has 2 beds.

  Max Occupancy: 3 (3 Adults)

  • Washing machine
  • Heating
  • Kitchen

Guest Reviews

• Empar (5/5): Le falta servicios, especialmente calefacción - Estaba bien el apartamento y cerca del m eetro. Hacía mucho frío, y no había mantas ni funcionaba la calefacción.
• Chi (3/5): Bad facilities, unclean, mice. - I'm told the bed was comfortable and it was quiet. It was for 3 people. 2 in the bed and 1 on a sofa bed. However, no linen, blankets or duvet for the sofa. Had to wrap in a few layers of clothes and try to sleep. Was also cold. No heating and no hot water. Messaged the owners. Only got a reply a day after I left. Also clear evidence of a mouse problem. Not often I can say I genuinely felt ripped off. Does Booking/com not have any way to verify the quality or lack of quality of the places listed. If I'd paid half the price I did, I'd still feel robbed.
• Scott (7/5): -
• Alistair (8/5): - Location and spacious apartment in lovely, residential area with decent local amenities and transportation
• William (3/5): Will not stay there again. - Location General cleanliness, bins overflowing, plastic bags everywhere, garden full of weeds, cigarette butts and paper cups.
• Ian (1/5): Sadly, overall a very poor experience. - Good location Had arranged a confirmed 2pm check in. Messaged manager numerous times and the property check in details were only received at 14.18. Checked in and it was immediately apparent the property had not been cleaned. Contacted the manager who was very apologetic and agreed that the property had not been cleaned and was now outside. Cleaner did a good job but it was not an ideal situation ! Property has a tv (not Smart) but there was no picture and it is not connected to an aerial. I reported this to the manager, who advised ‘Let me check that quickly’. He never replied with any further information !!
• Fco Javier (6/5): -
• Lindi (7/5): -
• White (5/5): Passable - Location was brilliant, flat needs a major re furb . Crack in bathroom sink extension cables running all over the place , dishes in kitchen still sticky . Had to wash plates before using . Tv wouldn't tune in to anything. Overall needs up dating ,and a better cleaner. All of above
• Silviya (7/5): Good -
• Thomas (2/5): Terrible standard of property and dismissive tone of host - avoid!! - The location is good Unfortunately, the property was significantly misrepresented both in terms of cleanliness and safety, and I had no choice but to leave on the first night. I would like to outline the key issues: 1. Lack of Security and Critical Omissions in Listing • The main entrance was a small, flimsy door directly facing a public road, secured only by a rusty, stiff lock. This crucial detail was not shown or disclosed in the listing. • A back patio door was also in poor condition — thin, old, and easy to force open — offering no real barrier or camera surveillance. This created a genuine safety concern, especially as a solo female guest. 2. Severe Cleanliness and Maintenance Issues • The flat had a strong musty smell, as though it had been uncleaned and unoccupied for weeks. • The kitchen was unhygienic, with sticky, oily surfaces, visibly stained walls, broken cupboard pieces, and expired or perished condiments. A dirty sponge that had been used for cleaning. • A general stickiness on counter tops where there’s a greasy feel that it has not been properly cleaned for a long time • The condition of the space was substantially worse than the photos, which clearly embellished the flat’s appearance. Given that I paid £390 for 3 nights, this level of accommodation was far below a reasonable standard. I left the property the same evening due to the discomfort, poor hygiene, and security concerns. Staying as a woman alone, I did not feel safe, and I had to leave the first night to stay somewhere else, incurring the cost of a hotel. The host was prompt in replying and admitted that the cleaning was NOT properly conducted once he checked the property however only offered £75 partial refund in total. Even though he was informed I would not be staying in the property and it is vacant. I will continue my claim with booking.com.
• Odile (7/5): Simple place, well located in Southfields - Good location not far from Southfields tube, easy autonomous check in and check out, was warm in winter. We have booked for 3 and the sofa bed was not made and ready and we arrived late. Not the most modern decor. There is no light at night when you try to open the door.
• Monica (4/5): Disappointing - The place wasn't clean.
• Ilona (10/5): Exceptional -
• Mikele (10/5): Exceptional -
• Brattle (10/5): Exceptional -

Photos